Arlingtonians will have the opportunity to vote on four County bond referenda totalling $72,905,000 which will appear on the Election Day ballot.Each of the four focuses on a different aspect of Arlington's ongoing multi-year capital improvement program. They are the kind of questions that must be decided in order to determine the funding of this capital program. The following questions and explanations were adopted for voter consideration by the Arlington County Board on August 3, 1996.
QUESTION: Shall Arlington County contract a debt and issue its general obligation bonds in the maximum amount of $9,560,000 pursuant to the Public Finance Act of 1991 to finance, together with other available funds, the costs of construction, acquisition and rehabilitation of Metrorail facilities by the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority?EXPLANATION: These funds would be used to continue the cost of Arlington's portion of construction, acquisition, and rehabilitation of Metrorail facilities. The proposed bond issue would provide funding for two major Metrorail capital programs: (1) Arlington County's share, through Fiscal Year 1998, of the cost to complete the last parts of the 103-mile Metrorail system (based upon existing agreements and federal authorizing legislation, the federal government would pay 62.5 percent, and localities 37.5 percent of new Metrorail construction); (2) the County's share for the next several years of the cost to rehabilitate and improve the current Metrorail system, where some rail segments and operating equipment are now more than 20 years old.
2-PUBLIC SCHOOL PROJECTS
QUESTION: Shall Arlington County contract a debt and issue its general obligation bonds in the maximum amount of $29,120,000 pursuant to the Public Finance Act of 1991 to finance, together with other available funds, the costs of various capital projects for Arlington County public school and community purposes?
EXPLANATION: This proposal would make funds available for the Arlington Public Schools' ongoing capital improvement program. This funding would be a primary part of the next major phase of the Public Schools' multi-year capital program initiatives.
The Schools' capital proposal was developed after a review of the physical conditions at school facilities and an analysis of existing and future facility needs of conditions at school facilities and an analysis of existing and future facility needs of the public school system. It is expected that the following six components of the Schools' capital program will be financed in part from this bond issue: (1) the construction of school classrooms, gymnasiums, support spaces; the acquisition of land; the design, renewal and rehabilitation of existing space and the construction of additional space to address building and program deficiencies and overcrowding, and to accommodate changing program requirements; (2) replacement of windows, ceilings, roofs and lights; (3) installation and renovation of heating, ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC), and energy conservation, including the replacement of boilers and the installation of new, or renovation of existing, air conditioning systems; (4) compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) requirements, including provisions for accessibility such as renovation to provide elevators, wheelchair lifts, ramps, doors, and conversions of bathroom facilities to accommodate the disabled; (5) fire alarms, emergency power, and similar life safety improvements; and (6) the installation of technology cabling to bring data, voice and video capability to instructional and administrative areas.
3-STREETS, HIGHWAYS, AND COMMUNITY CONSERVATION
QUESTION: Shall Arlington County contract a debt and issue its general obligation bonds in the maximum amount of $21,305,000 pursuant to the Public Finance Act of 1991 to finance, together with other available funds, the cost of street, highway and related improvements and the cost of public improvements made pursuant to County Board- approved transportation plans, conservation plans, and other similar plans for residential and commercial areas and other community improvements including the cost of acquiring, constructing, rehabilitating, landscaping, replacing and improving streets, highways, pedestrian ways, curbs, gutters, bridges, traffic controls, street lights and bikeways; installing lighting facilities; constructing storm drainage replacements and improvements; relocating utilities above or underground; and acquiring land, rights- of-say, easements and other interests in land for such projects?
EXPLANATION: This proposal would make funds available for Arlington's ongoing programs of street, highway, and community conservation capital improvements.
Street and highway projects would include the construction, rehabilitation or replacement of, and improvements to, streets and highways, bridges, curbs and gutters, bikeways, sidewalks, and other pedestrian ways. The funds could also be used for installation of traffic controls, street lights, relocating utilities above or underground, acquiring land, landscaping, improving or replacing storm drainage systems, and for other improvements to the transportation system described.
In addition, this proposal would make funds available for Arlington County's ongoing community conservation efforts. Since the beginning of the Neighborhood Conservation Program in 1964, the County has promoted joining private funds with public funds and resources to improve, upgrade, and conserve older residential and commercial areas of Arlington. Coordinated construction and improvements for community conservation could include all or some of the following: construction of roadways, curbs and gutters, and pedestrian ways; lighting; drainage improvements; landscaping; acquisition of land; and relocating utilities above or underground. Projects would include those in commercial and multi-family areas as well as single-family neighborhoods.
4-LOCAL AND REGIONAL PARKS AND RECREATION
QUESTION: Shall Arlington County contract a debt and issue its general obligation bonds in the maximum amount of $12,920,000 pursuant to the Public Finance Act of 1991 to finance, together with other available funds, the cost of acquiring, constructing, improving and equipping public parks, recreation and community facilities, including facilities owned or operated by other public or private non- profit entities, and to make contributions to the Northern Virginia Regional Park Authority for similar purposes to serve its member jurisdictions, including Arlington County?
EXPLANATION: Arlington has been conducting a program to acquire open space, develop recreation and community facilities, and participate in the Northern Virginia Regional Park Authority. This program would, as its primary goal, continue the ongoing policy of acquiring additional land for parks, and open space, as well as rounding out existing park sites. Funds would be used to finance: land acquisition and related demolition of existing structures, where necessary; and improvements to new and existing outdoor passive and active recreation facilities, including construction, equipping and improving related structures and jointly-used land and facilities shared between the County and other public or private non- profit entities, such as the County schools.
As a member of the Northern Virginia Regional Park Authority (NVRPA), along with Fairfax and Loudoun Counties and the Cities of Alexandria, Fairfax, and Falls Church, Arlington pays a share of the total capital expenditures of the NVRPA. Funds would be used for Arlington's contribution to the capital development program of the NVRPA during part or all of the period through Fiscal Year 1998, including amounts requested from prior years.
ASSOCIATION TO DISCUSS PROPOSED COUNTY BOND REFERENDA
If you have any questions or comments about the Arlington County proposed bond referenda, we invite you to bring them to our Membership Meeting on Wednesday, October 30, 1996, at the Arlington Central Library, 1015 N Quincy Street, Second Floor Meeting Room. This item is scheduled from 7:35 p.m. to 8:45 p.m. This matter is to be voted on at the November 5, 1996 Election.
Five proposed amendments to the Constitution of Virginia will be on the November 5, 1996, ballot. The proposed amendments were previously approved by the Virginia General Assembly at two prior regular sessions separated by a general election.
The source of the following information is the Commonwealth of Virginia's "Proposed Constitutional Amendments to be voted on the November 5, 1996, Special Election," Authorized By State Board of Elections, M. Bruce Meadows, Secretary, 200 North 9th Street, Room 101, Richmond, VA 23219-3497.
1-Proposed Constitutional Amendment PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM
BALLOT QUESTION: Shall the Constitution of Virginia be amended to provide that funds in the governmental employees retirement system shall be trust funds and be invested and administered solely in the interests of the members and beneficiaries of the system?
This amendment revises the provision that requires the General Assembly to maintain a retirement system for public employees.
The Constitution now contains one brief statement directing the General Assembly to maintain a retirement system for state employees. The General Assembly provides by law how the system operates, what retirement benefits are provided, and how taxpayers and employees pay for retirement benefits.
The Virginia Retirement System trust funds come from employer and employee contributions. The amounts of those contributions are set as provided by law. Money contributed by today's employers (the state and participating localities) and today's public employees, and earnings on that money, will pay for future costs of the retirement benefits for those employees. The Commonwealth uses "actuarial principles" to predict what those costs will be and to set those contributions rates. Actuarial principles take into account life expectancy and other factors to predict those costs.
In 1993, the General Assembly directed the Joint Legislative Audit and Review Commission to study the Virginia Retirement System. The Commission reported a number of recommendations to the 1994 General Assembly. One recommendation was that the General Assembly consider a constitutional amendment to strengthen the independence of the retirement system and to protect funds belonging to the system.
The Commission pointed out that the Virginia Retirement System operates under state statutes and federal tax laws. Those laws require the system to operate for the benefit of its members and retirees but, like any law, are subject to change by the legislature.
The Commission suggested that a constitutional amendment could guarantee that the funds belonging to the system would be independent trust funds and used solely for the benefit of the members and beneficiaries of the system. The proposed change would require the Commonwealth to hold the system's hold the system's funds separate from other state revenues and prevent the Commonwealth from using the funds for any other purpose.
In response to the Commission's report, the General Assembly has proposed the addition of the following specific requirements to the Constitution:
2-Proposed Constitutional Amendment RIGHTS OF VICTIMS OF CRIME
BALLOT QUESTION: Shall the Constitution of Virginia be amended to provide that victims of crime shall be treated with fairness, dignity, and respect in the criminal justice process and that the General Assembly may define, by law, the rights of victims of crime?
This amendment adds a provision to the Virginia Constitution's Bill of Rights concerning victims of crime. The new language describes the General Assembly's authority to pass laws concerning the rights or protection for victims of crime.
The Bill of Rights in the present Constitution does not mention victims of crime.
The proposed amendment adds a new provision to the Bill of Rights. The new provision begins with the statement that victims of crime should be treated with "fairness, dignity and respect" by the Commonwealth and its officers and employees. It also says that the General Assembly may provide by law that the victim of a crime will have certain rights. The General Assembly will be able to define and spell out what these rights will be.
The new provision lists seven examples of what rights might be provided by law for victims of crime. These examples include:
The General Assembly may provide by law for one or more of these rights and may provide different or additional rights or protections for victims of crime. In fact, the General Assembly has already passed several laws that give victims of crime some of these rights and protections.
The new provision does not give any victim of a crime the right to participate in a criminal case by appealing a decision or asking the court to change any decision. The new provision does not give any person the right to sue the Commonwealth or any public officer or employee for violations of these rights. Finally, the new provision does not change any right that the Constitution of the United States or Virginia now guarantees to any person accused of, or tried for, a crime.
3-Proposed Constitutional Amendment COMMONWEALTH'S RIGHT OF APPEAL
BALLOT QUESTION: Shall the Constitution be amended to authorize the General Assembly to allow the Commonwealth the right of an appeal in all cases, including criminal cases, provided that the appeal would not violate the Virginia or United States Constitution?
This amendment concerns the right of the Commonwealth to appeal to a higher court to overturn a decision by a lower court in a criminal case.
The Virginia Constitution limits the Commonwealth's or prosecution's right to appeal in a criminal cases. The Constitution sets out a general rule that the prosecution cannot ask a higher court to overturn the decision in a criminal case with two exceptions.
The first exception permits appeals by the Commonwealth when the crime involves state revenues or taxes. The second exception allows the Commonwealth to appeal certain decisions during the early stages of a felony case before the jury is sworn or, if it is not a jury case, before the judge hears any evidence. For example, the Commonwealth may appeal to a higher court to overturn the decision, made by a judge before the trial begins, that the Commonwealth may not use evidence which it obtained through a search or confession.
Most states do not have a constitutional provision on this topic but provide by law when the prosecution may appeal and what the limits are on the appeal rights of the prosecution.
The United States and Virginia Constitutions also limit the right of the prosecution to appeal through the "double jeopardy" principle. No person can be tried or "put in jeopardy" twice for the same offense. The Commonwealth cannot try a person more than once for a crime.
The proposed amendment replaces the present Constitution's provision which limits the Commonwealth's right of appeal. The new language permits the General Assembly to pass laws on the question of when the Commonwealth may appeal. The laws passed by the General Assembly must not violate other provisions of the United States or Virginia Constitutions. The rules against trying a person twice for the same crime will still apply.
4-Proposed Constitutional Amendment VOTING AND VOTER REGISTRATION
BALLOT QUESTION: Shall the Constitution of Virginia be amended so that the form for voter registration applications may be revised and so that voters who move within Virginia may be allowed to vote in their former precincts under the conditions and time limits provided by law?
This amendment gives the General Assembly more authority to enact laws concerning two matters affecting voters: what information should be required on an application to register to vote and how voters may continue to vote after they move within the Commonwealth.
VOTER REGISTRATION APPLICATIONS
Virginia's Constitution sets out a detailed list of the information required on voter registration applications. Most states provide what information a new voter must give on an application to register by legislation, rather than in their constitutions.
The National Voter Registration Act of 1993 provides for a national form for registering to vote in federal elections. That form does not require all of the information required by Virginia's current Constitution. For example, the federal form does not require place of birth. So long as Virginia's Constitution requires more information than the federal form does, there is a possibility that Virginia would have to keep separate list of voters who register by using the federal form. Those voters would be eligible to vote in federal elections but not in state or local elections.
The proposed amendment keeps the present Constitution's requirements for information on full name, date of birth, residence address, social security number, if any, and United States citizenship. The amendment deletes other specific items of information. However, the amendment gives the General Assembly authority to require other information by law and will allow Virginia to accept the federal form for federal, state, and local elections.
VOTERS WHO MOVE WITHIN VIRGINIA
As a rule, voters must be residents of the precinct where they vote. When voters move to another precinct, they must transfer their registration to the new precinct and vote there. Virginia's Constitution gives voters who move from one precinct to another within Virginia up to a year to change their voter registration to the new address and permits voters to continue voting in their old precinct through the next November general election. In certain cases, the National Voter Registration Act differs from Virginia law, gives voters more time to change their registration, and permits them to continue voting for their congressman for two federal elections.
The proposed amendment replaces the Constitution's present provision with new language. The new provision will allow the General Assembly to provide by law how voters who move within the Commonwealth may continue to vote until they change their registration.
The new language states that the General Assembly may set the time limits and conditions under which voters who move within the Commonwealth may continue to vote in their old precinct. For example, the General Assembly could give voters more time, in appropriate cases, to transfer their registration to the new residence and could eliminate the difference between the National Act and state election laws on this issue.
5-Proposed Constitutional Amendment INCORPORATION OF CHURCHES AND RELIGIOUS DENOMINATIONS
BALLOT QUESTION: Shall the Constitution of Virginia be amended to remove the language which prohibits the General Assembly from passing a law permitting incorporation of any church or religious organization?
The amendment deletes a provision in the present Constitution that prohibits the incorporation of churches and religious denominations. The amendment will allow the General Assembly to provide, by law, permission for churches to incorporate. When a group of people form a corporation under state law, the corporation is treated as a separate entity from the group. Among other things, the law allows a corporation to own property separately from the groups and to continue to own the property in the name of the corporation although the members of the group change from time to time.
The Constitution now says "The General Assembly shall not grant a charter of incorporation to any church or religious denomination, but may secure the title to church property to an extent to be limited by law." Article IV, Section 14.
Members of the General Assembly and scholars have disagreed on the exact meaning of this limit on the powers of this limit on the powers of the General Assembly. Some people argue that it means that the General Assembly cannot pass a law that gives a specific church a charter of incorporation. Others argue that the provision means that the General Assembly cannot pass a law allowing churches in general to incorporate.
In 1969, the Commission on Constitutional Revision recommended that this provision be deleted from the Constitution. The Commission questioned whether the provision discriminated against religious bodies. It thought that the provision might violate the First Amendment of the United States Constitution by limiting religious freedom. The Commission said the provision denied religious bodies the choice to incorporate when other groups have that choice.
The 1969 General Assembly disagreed with the Commission and kept the provision in the Constitution. Some members agreed with the Commission, but a majority opposed any change. The majority argued that churches have no need to incorporate and that the provision protects churches from interference by the state.
The proposed amendment deletes the present prohibition. The amendment strikes the words: "shall not grant a charter of incorporation to any church or religious denomination, but." (The amendment does not change the provision that authorizes the General Assembly to pass laws limiting church property holdings.)
If the amendment is adopted, the General Assembly will be able to give churches and religious bodies the option to incorporate under state law.
ASSOCIATION TO DISCUSS PROPOSED CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENTS
If you have any questions or comments about the Commonwealth of Virginia proposed constitutional amendments, we invite you to bring them to our Membership Meeting on Wednesday, October 30, 1996, at the Arlington Central Library, 1015 N Quincy Street, Second Floor Meeting Room. This item is scheduled from approximately 8:45 p.m. to 9:25 p.m., following the discussion of Arlington County's 1996 Park Bond issue. This matter is to be voted on at the November 5, 1996 Election.